Climate Change is a Hoax

The view on climate change seems settled. Everybody  agrees it is happening and that it will be catastrophic to the planet. Naysayers, such as myself, are regarded as ridiculous or outrageous. I want to rehabilitate my view by defending three propositions: the evidence of climate change is inconclusive; that climate change is man made is denied in action though not in words, and even if there is world wide climate chane, it will not be a catastrophe.

There was a dramatic change in climate measurement in the Eighties and Nineties. Space satellites were able to measure the surface temperatures of oceans and those measurements were combined with land measurements to update global temperatures. Those new measurements showed global measurements to be increasing exponentially but it was not clear that the increase was a result of the change in the measurement of global temperature or an actual increase in the globe’s temperature. Al Gore, in his academy Award documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” said that global warming would continue and speculated that within a generation a third of Fkorida might well be found underwater even though the chart on the wall behind Gore showed global warming as plateauing even though at a higher level than in previous decades.

I looked carefully at the official yearly reports on climate change produced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration during the oughts. They provided curious results. They did not provide straightforward charts of a list of years and the corresponding global  temperatures, Rather they said that global temperatures had been modified by historic trends and other adjustments not specified. They also said things like “Four of the last ten years were the highest global temperatures” without saying it was on a high plateau that might have stabilized, and those reports did not mention the global temperature when it had gone down.

Meanwhile, and furthermore,other claims of precipitous dangers as a result of climate change were also made. There were forest fires in both Northern and Southern California that were attributed to the dryness of the timber as a result of climate change, and so an impending apocalypse. But more ordinary events intruded on that narrative, Firebugs were identified as the culprits. Power lines had been introduced into areas that  had recently been populated. Some of the connecting electrical lines had  fallen down and ignited the fires. The solution is to bury power lines even though that is more expensive than hanging them in the air tied to masts. There had been in the Fifties a water shortage in New York City which led restaurants to provide glasses of water only if they were asked by the patrons. This was going to be a long term problem. The problem was solved by building another water tunnel to bring clean and abundant water from the Adorandicks. Water levels in oceans are rising, as well may be the case. But the reason that so much money has to be spent on redeeming flood insurance is because people buy lots ad build because ocean views are so popular and the government subsidizes flood insurance.

There are a lot of glaciers melting. A new Northwest Passage is opening up between Canada and Greenland. But maybe there was anNorthwest Passage a thousand years ago that we have not yet discovered. After all, there were grapevines a thousand years ago in Labrador and flocks of sheep in Greenland. We have not achieved that level of global warmth at the present time. Worry about it when we get that warm. Maybe climate change is cyclical though measured in millennia. A more recent climate event was what is called the little ice age where in the fourteenth century there was sufficient cold for retreats of farming went down mountainsides and the weather may have resulted in the Black Plague.

If most Americans believe that climate change is certain, why is it that so few efforts are exerted to alleviate it? Low lying cities like Miami or Houston have not been evacuated or prepared to evacuate,  yes, New Orleans built a new set of dams and levees but that only happened after Hurricane Katrina. New York City did not even plant swamp grass in the Manhattan side of the East River to alleviate flooding. Bo big taxes on McMansions which are notorious fuel guzzlers while not encouraging building apartment houses which are fuel efficient. Yes, there are state subsidiaries for solar power, bur that is state funded to subsidize realty costs. 

There atr two reasons for that. First off, people like apocalyptic stories even if they are scary because they are able to organize their minds about dangers and survival and see political leaders as corrupt or evil. Exodus was an apocalypse except that a miracle interview. The story of Jesus is an apocalypse. IN those still living will arise the second Coming.So apocalyptic imaginations are satisfying for their own sakes, such as a nuclear war between the USSR and the ya which might well have happened and preoccupied our imaginations between 1947 and 1989 The second reason is political. Apocalypses are invented to distract from more dangerous political events. The United States invented Earth Day so as to deflect people from thinking about the previous unrest that had disturbed the Vietnam War. Earth Day was relatively hartm;rss 

A year or so ago the United Nations decided that it should no longer declare how high should be the new acceptable climate change increase. That  was because the rise was just conventional; It was decided by consensus rather than because it represented irreversible or catastrophic change. That is because the rise depends on when people thought climate chane started. Most people  think it started with the Industrial revolution and smokestack emissions. I n that case, it started around 1800. But that started to decline in the Eighties because there was a switch from factory wastes to computer industries which use less energy to produce their industries . Even more recent industries, such as AI data storages, now again require vast amounts of energy but people don’t seem to be concerned with  that, only who will pat taxes for that. Total emissions don’t matter Climate change doesn’t matter.

Let us presume for a moment that climate chane is real and will prove devastating. That will mpt make it catastrophic. Yes, the Southern United States may become unlivable. But Canada can develop four crops of wheat and so will Siberia. There will be plenty of food for the world’s population, and a reallocation of the world’s poopu;ation in the ext two hundred tears. Don’t worry about it. Just adapt.